Fact-checking before anything goes live
The real risk with automated content is not that it sounds robotic. It is that it confidently states a price, a code requirement or a statistic that nobody checked. On a service business website that costs trust, and in regulated fields it can cost more. StrideRank treats every sentence that contains a number, a price, a percentage or a year as a claim to verify, compares it against the research gathered for that article, and flags anything the sources do not support. An article that fails the checks stays unpublished.
Claims are picked out mechanically
The checker does not ask a model whether an article "seems accurate". It extracts the sentences that contain figures and passes them, numbered, together with the sources. The model can only point to sentences that are actually in the article — it cannot invent a problem or quietly rewrite one.
Rules that do not need a model
Next to the fact check, fixed rules run on every article: a minimum length, no duplicated paragraphs, title and description within display limits, a minimum number of FAQ entries, the lead box exactly once, and none of the statements you told us never to make.
Nothing your website does not back up
When StrideRank reads your website, it also notes what the site does not support: concrete prices, guarantees, licenses, awards or response times you never state. Those become statements the writer must not make, and an article that makes one anyway fails the check.
Common questions
- Does fact-checking mean the article is legally reviewed?
- No. It checks that figures are backed by the research sources. Professional or legal review is still your call — approval mode exists for exactly that.
- What happens when an article fails?
- It is not published. In approval mode you see why it failed; on autopilot it simply does not go out.
- Are sources shown in the article?
- Sources are kept with each article so you can see what a statement rests on when you review it.